|
RCW 9.94A.74501 State Council. |
|
(1) The sentencing guidelines commission shall serve as the
state council for interstate adult offender supervision as required under
article IV of RCW 9.94A.745,
the interstate compact for adult offender supervision. To assist the commission
in performing its functions as the state council, the department of corrections
shall provide staffing and support services. The commission may form a
subcommittee, including members representing the legislative, judicial, and
executive branches of state government, victims' groups, and the secretary of
corrections, to perform the functions of the state council. Any such
subcommittee shall include representation of both houses and at least two of the
four largest political caucuses in the legislature.
(2) The commission, or a subcommittee if formed for that purpose, shall:
(a) Review department operations and procedures under RCW 9.94A.745,
and recommend policies to the compact administrator, including policies to be
pursued in the administrator's capacity as the state's representative on the
interstate commission created under article III of RCW 9.94A.745;
(b) Report annually to the legislature on interstate supervision operations and
procedures under RCW 9.94A.745,
including recommendations for policy changes; and
(c) Not later than December 1, 2004, report to the legislature on the
effectiveness of its functioning as the state council under article IV of RCW 9.94A.745,
and recommend any legislation it deems appropriate.
(3) The commission, or a subcommittee if formed for that purpose, shall appoint
one of its members, or an employee of the department designated by the
secretary, to represent the state at meetings of the interstate commission
created under article III of RCW 9.94A.745
when the compact administrator cannot attend.
[2001 c 35 § 3.]
|
RCW 9.94A.74502 Compact Administrator. |
|
The secretary of corrections, or an employee of the
department designated by the secretary, shall serve as the compact administrator
under article IV of RCW 9.94A.745,
the interstate compact for adult offender supervision. The legislature intends
that the compact administrator, representing the state on the interstate
commission created under article III of RCW 9.94A.745,
will take an active role to assure that the interstate compact operates to
protect the safety of the people and communities of the state.
[2001 c 35 § 4.]
|
Other
Compacts and Agreements — Withdrawal From Current Compact. |
|
(1)
The state shall continue to meet its obligations under RCW 9.95.270,
the interstate compact for the supervision of parolees and probationers, to
those states which continue to meet their obligations to the state of Washington
under the interstate compact for the supervision of parolees and probationers,
and have not approved the interstate compact for adult offender supervision
after July 1, 2001.
(2) If a state withdraws from the interstate compact for adult offender
supervision under article XII(a) of RCW 9.94A.745,
the state council for interstate adult offender supervision created by RCW 9.94A.74501 shall seek to negotiate an agreement with the
withdrawing state fulfilling the purposes of RCW 9.94A.745,
subject to the approval of the legislature.
(3) Nothing in chapter 35, Laws of 2001 limits the secretary's authority to
enter into agreements with other jurisdictions for supervision of offenders.
[2001
c 35 § 5.]
|
RCW 9.94A.74504 Supervision of Transferred Offenders —
Processing Transfer Applications. |
|
(1) The department may supervise nonfelony offenders
transferred to
(2) The department shall process applications for interstate transfer of felony
and nonfelony offenders pursuant to RCW 9.94A.745,
the interstate compact for adult offender supervision, and may charge offenders
a reasonable fee for processing the application.
[2005 c 400 § 1.]
Notes:
|
Application -- 2005 c 400: "This act
applies to offenders sentenced before, on, or after July 1, 2005."
[2005 c 400 § 8.] Effective date -- 2005 c 400: "This act
is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health,
or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public
institutions, and takes effect July 1, 2005." [2005 c 400 § 9.] |
|
RCW 9.94A.750 Restitution. |
|
This section applies to offenses committed on or before
July 1, 1985.
(1) If restitution is ordered, the court shall determine the amount of
restitution due at the sentencing hearing or within one hundred eighty days. The
court may continue the hearing beyond the one hundred eighty days for good
cause. The court shall then set a minimum monthly payment that the offender is
required to make towards the restitution that is ordered. The court should take
into consideration the total amount of the restitution owed, the offender's
present, past, and future ability to pay, as well as any assets that the
offender may have.
(2) During the period of supervision, the community corrections officer may
examine the offender to determine if there has been a change in circumstances
that warrants an amendment of the monthly payment schedule. The community
corrections officer may recommend a change to the schedule of payment and shall
inform the court of the recommended change and the reasons for the change. The
sentencing court may then reset the monthly minimum payments based on the report
from the community corrections officer of the change in circumstances.
(3) Except as provided in subsection (6) of this section, restitution ordered by
a court pursuant to a criminal conviction shall be based on easily ascertainable
damages for injury to or loss of property, actual expenses incurred for
treatment for injury to persons, and lost wages resulting from injury.
Restitution shall not include reimbursement for damages for mental anguish, pain
and suffering, or other intangible losses, but may include the costs of
counseling reasonably related to the offense. The amount of restitution shall
not exceed double the amount of the offender's gain or the victim's loss from
the commission of the offense.
(4) For the purposes of this section, the offender shall remain under the
court's jurisdiction for a term of ten years following the offender's release
from total confinement or ten years subsequent to the entry of the judgment and
sentence, whichever period is longer. Prior to the expiration of the initial
ten-year period, the superior court may extend jurisdiction under the criminal
judgment an additional ten years for payment of restitution. The portion of the
sentence concerning restitution may be modified as to amount, terms and
conditions during either the initial ten-year period or subsequent ten-year
period if the criminal judgment is extended, regardless of the expiration of the
offender's term of community supervision and regardless of the statutory maximum
sentence for the crime. The court may not reduce the total amount of restitution
ordered because the offender may lack the ability to pay the total amount. The
offender's compliance with the restitution shall be supervised by the department
only during any period which the department is authorized to supervise the
offender in the community under RCW 9.94A.728,
9.94A.501,
or in which the offender is in confinement in a state correctional institution
or a correctional facility pursuant to a transfer agreement with the department,
and the department shall supervise the offender's compliance during any such
period. The department is responsible for supervision of the offender only
during confinement and authorized supervision and not during any subsequent
period in which the offender remains under the court's jurisdiction. The county
clerk is authorized to collect unpaid restitution at any time the offender
remains under the jurisdiction of the court for purposes of his or her legal
financial obligations.
(5) Restitution may be ordered whenever the offender is convicted of an offense
which results in injury to any person or damage to or loss of property or as
provided in subsection (6) of this section. In addition, restitution may be
ordered to pay for an injury, loss, or damage if the offender pleads guilty to a
lesser offense or fewer offenses and agrees with the prosecutor's recommendation
that the offender be required to pay restitution to a victim of an offense or
offenses which are not prosecuted pursuant to a plea agreement.
(6) Restitution for the crime of rape of a child in the first, second, or third
degree, in which the victim becomes pregnant, shall include: (a) All of the
victim's medical expenses that are associated with the rape and resulting
pregnancy; and (b) child support for any child born as a result of the rape if
child support is ordered pursuant to a proceeding in superior court or
administrative order for support for that child. The clerk must forward any
restitution payments made on behalf of the victim's child to the
(7) In addition to any sentence that may be imposed, an offender who has been
found guilty of an offense involving fraud or other deceptive practice or an
organization which has been found guilty of any such offense may be ordered by
the sentencing court to give notice of the conviction to the class of persons or
to the sector of the public affected by the conviction or financially interested
in the subject matter of the offense by mail, by advertising in designated areas
or through designated media, or by other appropriate means.
(8) This section does not limit civil remedies or defenses available to the
victim or offender including support enforcement remedies for support ordered
under subsection (6) of this section for a child born as a result of a rape of a
child victim. The court shall identify in the judgment and sentence the victim
or victims entitled to restitution and what amount is due each victim. The state
or victim may enforce the court-ordered restitution in the same manner as a
judgment in a civil action. Restitution collected through civil enforcement must
be paid through the registry of the court and must be distributed
proportionately according to each victim's loss when there is more than one
victim.
[2003 c 379 § 15; 2000 c 28 § 32. Prior: 1997 c 121 § 3;
1997 c 52 § 1; 1995 c 231 § 1; 1994 c 271 § 601; 1989 c 252 § 5; 1987 c 281
§ 3; 1982 c 192 § 5; 1981 c 137 § 14. Formerly RCW 9.94A.140.]
Notes:
|
Severability -- Effective dates -- 2003 c 379:
See notes following RCW 9.94A.728.
Intent -- Purpose -- 2003 c 379 §§ 13-27:
See note following RCW 9.94A.760.
Technical correction bill -- 2000 c 28: See
note following RCW 9.94A.015.
Retroactive application -- 1995 c 231 §§ 1 and
2: "Sections 1 and 2 of this act shall apply retroactively to
allow courts to set restitution in cases sentenced prior to July 23, 1995,
if: Purpose -- Severability -- 1994 c 271: See
notes following RCW 9A.28.020.
Purpose -- Prospective application -- Effective
dates -- Severability -- 1989 c 252: See notes following RCW 9.94A.030.
Effective date -- 1987 c 281: See note
following RCW 7.68.020. |
The 1995 Legislature
extended the time for determining the amount of restitution from 60 days to 180
days after the sentencing hearing, or longer for good cause. This extension is
retroactive to cases where the defendant was sentenced within a year before the
effective date (i.e., on or after July 23, 1994) and restitution was not set
within 60 days after that sentencing, unless the defendant would be unfairly
prejudiced by the delay. In cases
meeting that definition, the court may set restitution within 180 days of the
effective date, or later for good cause. The
same legislation prohibited the court from reducing the amount of restitution
ordered because the offender may not be able to pay the full amount, required
the court to identify each victim entitled to restitution and the amount due
each victim, authorized the state or any victim to collect restitution through
civil enforcement, and required that restitution collected be distributed
proportionately to multiple victims.
Ordinarily the
court’s jurisdiction to enforce restitution expires ten years after the entry
of the judgment and sentence or the offender’s release from total confinement,
whichever is later. The 1997 Legislature authorized the court to extend
jurisdiction an additional ten years for payment of restitution.
The 1997 Legislature
also required restitution, in cases of rape
of a child 1, 2, or 3 in which the
victim becomes pregnant, to include medical expenses and child support for up to
25 years.
|
RCW 9.94A.753 Restitution — Application Dates. |
|
This section applies to offenses committed after July 1,
1985.
(1) When restitution is ordered, the court shall determine the amount of
restitution due at the sentencing hearing or within one hundred eighty days
except as provided in subsection (7) of this section. The court may continue the
hearing beyond the one hundred eighty days for good cause. The court shall then
set a minimum monthly payment that the offender is required to make towards the
restitution that is ordered. The court should take into consideration the total
amount of the restitution owed, the offender's present, past, and future ability
to pay, as well as any assets that the offender may have.
(2) During the period of supervision, the community corrections officer may
examine the offender to determine if there has been a change in circumstances
that warrants an amendment of the monthly payment schedule. The community
corrections officer may recommend a change to the schedule of payment and shall
inform the court of the recommended change and the reasons for the change. The
sentencing court may then reset the monthly minimum payments based on the report
from the community corrections officer of the change in circumstances.
(3) Except as provided in subsection (6) of this section, restitution ordered by
a court pursuant to a criminal conviction shall be based on easily ascertainable
damages for injury to or loss of property, actual expenses incurred for
treatment for injury to persons, and lost wages resulting from injury.
Restitution shall not include reimbursement for damages for mental anguish, pain
and suffering, or other intangible losses, but may include the costs of
counseling reasonably related to the offense. The amount of restitution shall
not exceed double the amount of the offender's gain or the victim's loss from
the commission of the crime.
(4) For the purposes of this section, for an offense committed prior to July 1,
2000, the offender shall remain under the court's jurisdiction for a term of ten
years following the offender's release from total confinement or ten years
subsequent to the entry of the judgment and sentence, whichever period ends
later. Prior to the expiration of the initial ten-year period, the superior
court may extend jurisdiction under the criminal judgment an additional ten
years for payment of restitution. For an offense committed on or after July 1,
2000, the offender shall remain under the court's jurisdiction until the
obligation is completely satisfied, regardless of the statutory maximum for the
crime. The portion of the sentence concerning restitution may be modified as to
amount, terms, and conditions during any period of time the offender remains
under the court's jurisdiction, regardless of the expiration of the offender's
term of community supervision and regardless of the statutory maximum sentence
for the crime. The court may not reduce the total amount of restitution ordered
because the offender may lack the ability to pay the total amount. The
offender's compliance with the restitution shall be supervised by the department
only during any period which the department is authorized to supervise the
offender in the community under RCW 9.94A.728,
9.94A.501,
or in which the offender is in confinement in a state correctional institution
or a correctional facility pursuant to a transfer agreement with the department,
and the department shall supervise the offender's compliance during any such
period. The department is responsible for supervision of the offender only
during confinement and authorized supervision and not during any subsequent
period in which the offender remains under the court's jurisdiction. The county
clerk is authorized to collect unpaid restitution at any time the offender
remains under the jurisdiction of the court for purposes of his or her legal
financial obligations.
(5) Restitution shall be ordered whenever the offender is convicted of an
offense which results in injury to any person or damage to or loss of property
or as provided in subsection (6) of this section unless extraordinary
circumstances exist which make restitution inappropriate in the court's judgment
and the court sets forth such circumstances in the record. In addition,
restitution shall be ordered to pay for an injury, loss, or damage if the
offender pleads guilty to a lesser offense or fewer offenses and agrees with the
prosecutor's recommendation that the offender be required to pay restitution to
a victim of an offense or offenses which are not prosecuted pursuant to a plea
agreement.
(6) Restitution for the crime of rape of a child in the first, second, or third
degree, in which the victim becomes pregnant, shall include: (a) All of the
victim's medical expenses that are associated with the rape and resulting
pregnancy; and (b) child support for any child born as a result of the rape if
child support is ordered pursuant to a civil superior court or administrative
order for support for that child. The clerk must forward any restitution
payments made on behalf of the victim's child to the
(7) Regardless of the provisions of subsections (1) through (6) of this section,
the court shall order restitution in all cases where the victim is entitled to
benefits under the crime victims' compensation act, chapter 7.68
RCW. If the court does not order restitution and the victim of the crime has
been determined to be entitled to benefits under the crime victims' compensation
act, the department of labor and industries, as administrator of the crime
victims' compensation program, may petition the court within one year of entry
of the judgment and sentence for entry of a restitution order. Upon receipt of a
petition from the department of labor and industries, the court shall hold a
restitution hearing and shall enter a restitution order.
(8) In addition to any sentence that may be imposed, an offender who has been
found guilty of an offense involving fraud or other deceptive practice or an
organization which has been found guilty of any such offense may be ordered by
the sentencing court to give notice of the conviction to the class of persons or
to the sector of the public affected by the conviction or financially interested
in the subject matter of the offense by mail, by advertising in designated areas
or through designated media, or by other appropriate means.
(9) This section does not limit civil remedies or defenses available to the
victim, survivors of the victim, or offender including support enforcement
remedies for support ordered under subsection (6) of this section for a child
born as a result of a rape of a child victim. The court shall identify in the
judgment and sentence the victim or victims entitled to restitution and what
amount is due each victim. The state or victim may enforce the court-ordered
restitution in the same manner as a judgment in a civil action. Restitution
collected through civil enforcement must be paid through the registry of the
court and must be distributed proportionately according to each victim's loss
when there is more than one victim.
[2003 c 379 § 16. Prior: 2000 c 226 § 3; 2000 c 28 § 33;
prior: 1997 c 121 § 4; 1997 c 52 § 2; prior: 1995 c 231 § 2; 1995 c 33 § 4;
1994 c 271 § 602; 1989 c 252 § 6; 1987 c 281 § 4; 1985 c 443 § 10. Formerly
RCW 9.94A.142.]
Notes:
|
Severability -- Effective dates -- 2003 c 379:
See notes following RCW 9.94A.728.
Intent -- Purpose -- 2003 c 379 §§ 13-27:
See note following RCW 9.94A.760.
Finding -- Intent -- Severability -- 2000 c 226:
See notes following RCW 9.94A.505.
Technical correction bill -- 2000 c 28: See
note following RCW 9.94A.015.
Retroactive application -- 1995 c 231 §§ 1 and
2: See note following RCW 9.94A.750.
Purpose -- Severability -- 1994 c 271: See
notes following RCW 9A.28.020.
Purpose -- Prospective application -- Effective
dates -- Severability -- 1989 c 252: See notes following RCW 9.94A.030.
Effective date -- 1987 c 281: See note
following RCW 7.68.020.
Severability -- Effective date -- 1985 c 443: See
notes following RCW 7.69.010. |
The 1997 Legislature required the
Department of Corrections to supervise compliance with payment of legal
financial obligations for up to ten years after entry of the judgment and
sentence or release from total confinement.
The court was also authorized to extend the time for payment of legal
financial obligations a subsequent ten years, but the Department is not
responsible for supervision after the initial ten-year period.
|
RCW 9.94A.760 Legal Financial Obligations. |
|
(1) Whenever a person is convicted in superior court, the
court may order the payment of a legal financial obligation as part of the
sentence. The court must on either the judgment and sentence or on a subsequent
order to pay, designate the total amount of a legal financial obligation and
segregate this amount among the separate assessments made for restitution,
costs, fines, and other assessments required by law. On the same order, the
court is also to set a sum that the offender is required to pay on a monthly
basis towards satisfying the legal financial obligation. If the court fails to
set the offender monthly payment amount, the department shall set the amount if
the department has active supervision of the offender, otherwise the county
clerk shall set the amount. Upon receipt of an offender's monthly payment,
restitution shall be paid prior to any payments of other monetary obligations.
After restitution is satisfied, the county clerk shall distribute the payment
proportionally among all other fines, costs, and assessments imposed, unless
otherwise ordered by the court.
(2) If the court determines that the offender, at the time of sentencing, has
the means to pay for the cost of incarceration, the court may require the
offender to pay for the cost of incarceration at a rate of fifty dollars per day
of incarceration, if incarcerated in a prison, or the court may require the
offender to pay the actual cost of incarceration per day of incarceration, if
incarcerated in a county jail. In no case may the court require the offender to
pay more than one hundred dollars per day for the cost of incarceration. Payment
of other court-ordered financial obligations, including all legal financial
obligations and costs of supervision shall take precedence over the payment of
the cost of incarceration ordered by the court. All funds recovered from
offenders for the cost of incarceration in the county jail shall be remitted to
the county and the costs of incarceration in a prison shall be remitted to the
department.
(3) The court may add to the judgment and sentence or subsequent order to pay a
statement that a notice of payroll deduction is to be issued immediately. If the
court chooses not to order the immediate issuance of a notice of payroll
deduction at sentencing, the court shall add to the judgment and sentence or
subsequent order to pay a statement that a notice of payroll deduction may be
issued or other income-withholding action may be taken, without further notice
to the offender if a monthly court-ordered legal financial obligation payment is
not paid when due, and an amount equal to or greater than the amount payable for
one month is owed.
If a judgment and sentence or subsequent order to pay does not include the
statement that a notice of payroll deduction may be issued or other
income-withholding action may be taken if a monthly legal financial obligation
payment is past due, the department or the county clerk may serve a notice on
the offender stating such requirements and authorizations. Service shall be by
personal service or any form of mail requiring a return receipt.
(4) Independent of the department or the county clerk, the party or entity to
whom the legal financial obligation is owed shall have the authority to use any
other remedies available to the party or entity to collect the legal financial
obligation. These remedies include enforcement in the same manner as a judgment
in a civil action by the party or entity to whom the legal financial obligation
is owed. Restitution collected through civil enforcement must be paid through
the registry of the court and must be distributed proportionately according to
each victim's loss when there is more than one victim. The judgment and sentence
shall identify the party or entity to whom restitution is owed so that the
state, party, or entity may enforce the judgment. If restitution is ordered
pursuant to RCW 9.94A.750(6)
or 9.94A.753(6)
to a victim of rape of a child or a victim's child born from the rape, the
Washington state child support registry shall be identified as the party to whom
payments must be made. Restitution obligations arising from the rape of a child
in the first, second, or third degree that result in the pregnancy of the victim
may be enforced for the time periods provided under RCW 9.94A.750(6)
and 9.94A.753(6).
All other legal financial obligations for an offense committed prior to July 1,
2000, may be enforced at any time during the ten-year period following the
offender's release from total confinement or within ten years of entry of the
judgment and sentence, whichever period ends later. Prior to the expiration of
the initial ten-year period, the superior court may extend the criminal judgment
an additional ten years for payment of legal financial obligations including
crime victims' assessments. All other legal financial obligations for an offense
committed on or after July 1, 2000, may be enforced at any time the offender
remains under the court's jurisdiction. For an offense committed on or after
July 1, 2000, the court shall retain jurisdiction over the offender, for
purposes of the offender's compliance with payment of the legal financial
obligations, until the obligation is completely satisfied, regardless of the
statutory maximum for the crime. The department may only supervise the
offender's compliance with payment of the legal financial obligations during any
period in which the department is authorized to supervise the offender in the
community under RCW 9.94A.728,
9.94A.501,
or in which the offender is confined in a state correctional institution or a
correctional facility pursuant to a transfer agreement with the department, and
the department shall supervise the offender's compliance during any such period.
The department is not responsible for supervision of the offender during any
subsequent period of time the offender remains under the court's jurisdiction.
The county clerk is authorized to collect unpaid legal financial obligations at
any time the offender remains under the jurisdiction of the court for purposes
of his or her legal financial obligations.
(5) In order to assist the court in setting a monthly sum that the offender must
pay during the period of supervision, the offender is required to report to the
department for purposes of preparing a recommendation to the court. When
reporting, the offender is required, under oath, to respond truthfully and
honestly to all questions concerning present, past, and future earning
capabilities and the location and nature of all property or financial assets.
The offender is further required to bring all documents requested by the
department.
(6) After completing the investigation, the department shall make a report to
the court on the amount of the monthly payment that the offender should be
required to make towards a satisfied legal financial obligation.
(7)(a) During the period of supervision, the department may make a
recommendation to the court that the offender's monthly payment schedule be
modified so as to reflect a change in financial circumstances. If the department
sets the monthly payment amount, the department may modify the monthly payment
amount without the matter being returned to the court. During the period of
supervision, the department may require the offender to report to the department
for the purposes of reviewing the appropriateness of the collection schedule for
the legal financial obligation. During this reporting, the offender is required
under oath to respond truthfully and honestly to all questions concerning
earning capabilities and the location and nature of all property or financial
assets. The offender shall bring all documents requested by the department in
order to prepare the collection schedule.
(b) Subsequent to any period of supervision, or if the department is not
authorized to supervise the offender in the community, the county clerk may make
a recommendation to the court that the offender's monthly payment schedule be
modified so as to reflect a change in financial circumstances. If the county
clerk sets the monthly payment amount, or if the department set the monthly
payment amount and the department has subsequently turned the collection of the
legal financial obligation over to the county clerk, the clerk may modify the
monthly payment amount without the matter being returned to the court. During
the period of repayment, the county clerk may require the offender to report to
the clerk for the purpose of reviewing the appropriateness of the collection
schedule for the legal financial obligation. During this reporting, the offender
is required under oath to respond truthfully and honestly to all questions
concerning earning capabilities and the location and nature of all property or
financial assets. The offender shall bring all documents requested by the county
clerk in order to prepare the collection schedule.
(8) After the judgment and sentence or payment order is entered, the department
is authorized, for any period of supervision, to collect the legal financial
obligation from the offender. Subsequent to any period of supervision or, if the
department is not authorized to supervise the offender in the community, the
county clerk is authorized to collect unpaid legal financial obligations from
the offender. Any amount collected by the department shall be remitted daily to
the county clerk for the purpose of disbursements. The department and the county
clerks are authorized, but not required, to accept credit cards as payment for a
legal financial obligation, and any costs incurred related to accepting credit
card payments shall be the responsibility of the offender.
(9) The department or any obligee of the legal financial obligation may seek a
mandatory wage assignment for the purposes of obtaining satisfaction for the
legal financial obligation pursuant to RCW 9.94A.7701.
Any party obtaining a wage assignment shall notify the county clerk. The county
clerks shall notify the department, or the administrative office of the courts,
whichever is providing the monthly billing for the offender.
(10) The requirement that the offender pay a monthly sum towards a legal
financial obligation constitutes a condition or requirement of a sentence and
the offender is subject to the penalties for noncompliance as provided in RCW 9.94A.634,
9.94A.737,
or 9.94A.740.
(11)(a) Until January 1, 2004, the department shall mail individualized monthly
billings to the address known by the department for each offender with an
unsatisfied legal financial obligation.
(b) Beginning January 1, 2004, the administrative office of the courts shall
mail individualized monthly billings to the address known by the office for each
offender with an unsatisfied legal financial obligation.
(c) The billing shall direct payments, other than outstanding cost of
supervision assessments under RCW 9.94A.780,
parole assessments under RCW 72.04A.120,
and cost of probation assessments under RCW 9.95.214,
to the county clerk, and cost of supervision, parole, or probation assessments
to the department.
(d) The county clerk shall provide the administrative office of the courts with
notice of payments by such offenders no less frequently than weekly.
(e) The county clerks, the administrative office of the courts, and the
department shall maintain agreements to implement this subsection.
(12) The department shall arrange for the collection of unpaid legal financial
obligations during any period of supervision in the community through the county
clerk. The department shall either collect unpaid legal financial obligations or
arrange for collections through another entity if the clerk does not assume
responsibility or is unable to continue to assume responsibility for collection
pursuant to subsection (4) of this section. The costs for collection services
shall be paid by the offender.
(13) The county clerk may access the records of the employment security
department for the purposes of verifying employment or income, seeking any
assignment of wages, or performing other duties necessary to the collection of
an offender's legal financial obligations.
(14) Nothing in this chapter makes the department, the state, the counties, or
any state or county employees, agents, or other persons acting on their behalf
liable under any circumstances for the payment of these legal financial
obligations or for the acts of any offender who is no longer, or was not,
subject to supervision by the department for a term of community custody,
community placement, or community supervision, and who remains under the
jurisdiction of the court for payment of legal financial obligations.
[2005 c 263 § 1; 2004 c 121 § 3; 2003 c 379 § 14; 2001 c
10 § 3. Prior: 2000 c 226 § 4; 2000 c 28 § 31; 1999 c 196 § 6; prior: 1997 c
121 § 5; 1997 c 52 § 3; 1995 c 231 § 3; 1991 c 93 § 2; 1989 c 252 § 3.
Formerly RCW 9.94A.145.]
Notes:
|
Intent -- Purpose--2003 c 379 §§ 13-27:
"The legislature intends to revise and improve the processes for
billing and collecting legal financial obligations. The purpose of
sections 13 through 27, chapter 379, Laws of 2003 is to respond to
suggestions and requests made by county government officials, and in
particular county clerks, to assume the collection of such obligations in
cooperation and coordination with the department of corrections and the
administrative office for [of] the courts. The legislature undertakes this
effort following a collaboration between local officials, the department
of corrections, and the administrative office for [of] the courts. The
intent of sections 13 through 27, chapter 379, Laws of 2003 is to promote
an increased and more efficient collection of legal financial obligations
and, as a result, improve the likelihood that the affected agencies will
increase the collections which will provide additional benefits to all
parties and, in particular, crime victims whose restitution is dependent
upon the collections." [2003 c 379 § 13.] Severability -- Effective dates -- 2003 c 379:
See notes following RCW 9.94A.728.
Intent -- Effective date -- 2001 c 10: See
notes following RCW 9.94A.505.
Finding -- Intent -- Severability -- 2000 c 226:
See notes following RCW 9.94A.505.
Technical correction bill -- 2000 c 28: See
note following RCW 9.94A.015.
Construction -- Short title -- 1999 c 196: See
RCW 72.09.904
and 72.09.905.
Severability -- 1999 c 196: See note following
RCW 9.94A.010.
Retroactive application -- Captions not law --
1991 c 93: See notes following RCW 9.94A.7601.
Purpose -- Prospective application -- Effective
dates -- Severability -- 1989 c 252: See notes following RCW 9.94A.030. |
Comment
The 1995 Legislature
extended the time for determining the amount of restitution from 60 days to 180
days after the sentencing hearing, or longer for good cause. This extension is
retroactive to cases where the defendant was sentenced within a year before the
effective date (i.e., on or after July 23, 1994) and restitution was not set
within 60 days after that sentencing, unless the defendant would be unfairly
prejudiced by the delay. In cases
meeting that definition, the court may set restitution within 180 days of the
effective date, or later for good cause. The
same legislation prohibited the court from reducing the amount of restitution
ordered because the offender may not be able to pay the full amount, required
the court to identify each victim entitled to restitution and the amount due
each victim, authorized the state or any victim to collect restitution through
civil enforcement, and required that restitution collected be distributed
proportionately to multiple victims. This
legislation was apparently in response to State v. Krall, 125 Wn. 2d 146 (1994).
The 1995 Legislature
also authorized the Department of Labor and Industries, which administers the
State Crime Victim Compensation Program, to petition the court to order
restitution on behalf of a victim entitled to compensation by the program.
The same legislation provided an administrative mechanism for the
Department to recover from offenders the amounts paid to victims under the
program.
Ordinarily the
court’s jurisdiction to enforce restitution expires ten years after the entry
of the judgment and sentence or the offender’s release from total confinement,
whichever is later. The 1997
Legislature authorized the court to extend jurisdiction an additional ten years
for payment of restitution.
The 1997 Legislature
also required restitution, in cases of Rape
of a child 1, 2, or 3 in which the
victim becomes pregnant, to include medical expenses and child support for up to
25 years.